Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36101 - 36110 of 57346 for id.
Search results 36101 - 36110 of 57346 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the error, bears the burden of persuasion that the error was harmless. Id., ¶¶45, 76. “The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65821 - 2011-06-14
of the error, bears the burden of persuasion that the error was harmless. Id., ¶¶45, 76. “The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65821 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
is whether the police conduct in question was reasonable under the circumstances. Id. at 87. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51291 - 2014-09-15
is whether the police conduct in question was reasonable under the circumstances. Id. at 87. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51291 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
% minimum extended supervision requirement.” Id., 322 Wis. 2d 737, ¶11. The second case, State v. Ash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99723 - 2014-09-15
% minimum extended supervision requirement.” Id., 322 Wis. 2d 737, ¶11. The second case, State v. Ash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99723 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David M. Pleau
(Ct. App. 1997). This is an objective standard; the officer’s subjective opinion is irrelevant. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7415 - 2017-09-20
(Ct. App. 1997). This is an objective standard; the officer’s subjective opinion is irrelevant. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7415 - 2017-09-20
State v. Christopher A. Frost
of the circumstances, the identification was nevertheless reliable. Id. Factors that are relevant to the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9708 - 2005-03-31
of the circumstances, the identification was nevertheless reliable. Id. Factors that are relevant to the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9708 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of reasonableness.” Id. “To prove constitutional prejudice, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68377 - 2011-07-25
of reasonableness.” Id. “To prove constitutional prejudice, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68377 - 2011-07-25
CA Blank Order
). Whether a plaintiff acts with “reasonable diligence” depends on the facts of each case. Id. at 587. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144289 - 2015-07-07
). Whether a plaintiff acts with “reasonable diligence” depends on the facts of each case. Id. at 587. When
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144289 - 2015-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS
provided.” Id. If the defendant makes a prima facie showing, the burden shifts to the State to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79722 - 2012-03-20
provided.” Id. If the defendant makes a prima facie showing, the burden shifts to the State to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79722 - 2012-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probability that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the outcome would have been different. Id. at 695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88861 - 2014-09-15
probability that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the outcome would have been different. Id. at 695
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88861 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jeffrey Plummer v. State
may not substitute our view of the evidence for that of the department. Id. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8113 - 2017-09-19
may not substitute our view of the evidence for that of the department. Id. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8113 - 2017-09-19