Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36101 - 36110 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 36101 - 36110 of 58245 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
weapon. He also appeals a postconviction order denying his claim that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143202 - 2017-09-21
weapon. He also appeals a postconviction order denying his claim that trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143202 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. also argues that he should receive a new trial because the circuit court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43027 - 2014-09-15
. also argues that he should receive a new trial because the circuit court erroneously admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43027 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
a hearing. The issue on appeal is whether Gulley received ineffective assistance of trial, postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3792 - 2017-09-20
a hearing. The issue on appeal is whether Gulley received ineffective assistance of trial, postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3792 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
assertion that trial counsel gave him ineffective assistance. In the postconviction motion, Burks argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574347 - 2022-10-12
assertion that trial counsel gave him ineffective assistance. In the postconviction motion, Burks argued
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=574347 - 2022-10-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
)(a) and (b). Wiklin contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40560 - 2014-09-15
)(a) and (b). Wiklin contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40560 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Romel D.
. appeals the trial court’s order finding him delinquent after he entered a plea of guilty to possessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
. appeals the trial court’s order finding him delinquent after he entered a plea of guilty to possessing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15775 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP71-CR 3 ¶5 Rushing testified at trial that most of what he told the police was true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159838 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP71-CR 3 ¶5 Rushing testified at trial that most of what he told the police was true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159838 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Rock v. James M. Goldhagen
a prohibited alcohol concentration. Nos. 00-0983-FT and 00-0984-FT 3 trial, he moved to exclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2485 - 2017-09-19
a prohibited alcohol concentration. Nos. 00-0983-FT and 00-0984-FT 3 trial, he moved to exclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2485 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
a hearing. The issue on appeal is whether Gulley received ineffective assistance of trial, postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20
a hearing. The issue on appeal is whether Gulley received ineffective assistance of trial, postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3793 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
and expressly stated he would “have no expert witnesses for trial.” ¶7 Livengood and Northeast moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28779 - 2014-09-15
and expressly stated he would “have no expert witnesses for trial.” ¶7 Livengood and Northeast moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28779 - 2014-09-15