Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36111 - 36120 of 83123 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
the mitigating circumstances in this case, including the fact that Madison did not organize or plan the crime, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86886 - 2012-09-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862944 - 2024-10-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=862944 - 2024-10-15

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Letter of Governor Evers re signing of Senate Bill 488 and special or recall elections
, WI 53701-1688 Re: Rebecca Clarke, et al. v. Wisconsin Elections Commission, et al., Case
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0219eversletter.pdf - 2024-02-19

Lori L. Fleig v. Patrick A. Fleig
in proper legal principles and the facts of this case. We therefore conclude that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2808 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that this case is moot, and we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND ¶2 On April 28, 2023
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953495 - 2025-05-13

[PDF] State v. Kenneth R. Zielinski
to support the State's case. Consequently, the credibility of Zielinski and the alleged victim, L.Z., were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8615 - 2017-09-19

State v. Mario D. Harrell
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Dwayne O. Jackson
Case No. 99-CF-196. ¶3 On March 22, 2000, Jackson pled no contest to the charge of having sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3333 - 2017-09-19

Susan R. Schlough v. Citizens Security Mutual Insurance Company
N.W.2d at 105-06. The rule applied in the Walley cases was not abrogated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10580 - 2005-03-31