Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36121 - 36130 of 38200 for ph d.

State v. Johnell Sartin
. Affirming the judgment of conviction, this court stated that "[u]nder sec. 161.30(2)(d), Stats. 1969
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16891 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 95
to be determined by the Board; or (c) demoted to a lower rank; or (d) participate in policy training. 7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155848 - 2017-09-21

Order-SC
H. D. Peterson Stroud, Willink & Howard, LLC P.O. Box 2236 Madison, WI 53701-2236 *Additional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84630 - 2012-10-08

Mabel A.O. v. Conservatorship of Mabel A.O.
; and (d) the judgment fails to credit Mabel with $3,202.58 paid by the conservator. ¶3 Martha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15169 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ralph E. Ruesch
, the victim. Section 940.32(1)(a) and (d), Stats. In regard to manner, the conduct must be intentional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11236 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
) Whether one of the parties has substantial assets not subject to division by the court. (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47804 - 2010-03-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
genitals and asked her, “[D]oes it feel good[?]” She said that this occurred in the bedroom she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678058 - 2023-07-13

[PDF] WI APP 60
was transferred to the WRC. ¶23 Rachel’s expert witness, Dr. Rosell, testified that he believed Rachel “ha[d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48168 - 2014-09-15

State v. Melvin W. Range, Inc.
court “overrule[d] that portion of ACLU which stands for the proposition that regardless of the reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10162 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 184
. However, Dr. Schmitt also stated: [D]ue to specifics involved with Mr. Arends’ offense history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34606 - 2014-09-15