Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36121 - 36130 of 58507 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
and the same side of the hotel as room 402. ¶3 Officer Zimmerman testified at trial as follows. When he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22

State v. Tammy F.
. In preparation for a possible trial on the termination of her parental rights, Tammy F. served members
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9110 - 2005-03-31

United States Fire Protection v. St. Michael's Hospital of Franciscan Sisters
Protection appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of St. Michael’s Hospital. The issue is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13306 - 2005-03-31

Lieutenant Garilyn Truttschel v. Police Chief Hugh Martin
of court did not commence circuit court review on Truttschel’s behalf. The trial court granted Martin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11184 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) (2009-10),1 after a jury trial. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85419 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Barney A. Guarnero v. Gerald A. Berge
. The trial court construed the complaint as a certiorari petition seeking review of a disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6544 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lieutenant Garilyn Truttschel v. Police Chief Hugh Martin
on Truttschel’s behalf. The trial court granted Martin’s motion, after concluding that Truttschel had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11184 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of counsel, at trial and during postconviction proceedings; and a claim of circuit court error for its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087493 - 2026-03-11

City of Brookfield v. Daniel D. Ulmen
. The dismissal order followed the trial court’s ruling that the temporary detention of Ulmen’s vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3624 - 2005-03-31

State v. Marcus M.
of review when a trial court has refused to suppress evidence the accused claims was obtained in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15694 - 2005-03-31