Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36121 - 36130 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 36121 - 36130 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-person jury trial, a citizen witness testified that he called 911 after observing a vehicle driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159879 - 2017-09-21
-person jury trial, a citizen witness testified that he called 911 after observing a vehicle driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159879 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sean W. Ottman
requesting that his sentence be credited with the thirty days, but the trial court denied his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15975 - 2017-09-21
requesting that his sentence be credited with the thirty days, but the trial court denied his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15975 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212867 - 2018-05-16
that trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212867 - 2018-05-16
City of Shullsburg v. Ronald L. Monahan
. We conclude that witness credibility is for trial courts to determine and that the arresting officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that witness credibility is for trial courts to determine and that the arresting officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13387 - 2005-03-31
Betty L. Hull v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Automobile Insurance Company. Hull argues that the trial court erroneously concluded that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12172 - 2005-03-31
Automobile Insurance Company. Hull argues that the trial court erroneously concluded that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12172 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
money judgment entered, following a trial to the court, in the amount of $772.33 against Progressive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
money judgment entered, following a trial to the court, in the amount of $772.33 against Progressive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
would “have no expert witnesses for trial.” ¶7 Livengood and Northeast moved for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28779 - 2007-04-23
would “have no expert witnesses for trial.” ¶7 Livengood and Northeast moved for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28779 - 2007-04-23
August E. Fabyan v. Gregg Achtenhagen
appeals from a judgment and order of the trial court dismissing his complaint again the Town of Delafield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4675 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a judgment and order of the trial court dismissing his complaint again the Town of Delafield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4675 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Anderson
jumping charges and from the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief.[1] He claims that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
jumping charges and from the trial court’s order denying postconviction relief.[1] He claims that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10226 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
George E. Thornton v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
argues that the trial court incorrectly applied the standard of review to reverse the commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5228 - 2017-09-19
argues that the trial court incorrectly applied the standard of review to reverse the commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5228 - 2017-09-19