Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36131 - 36140 of 66013 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 36131 - 36140 of 66013 for motion to dismiss.
[PDF]
NOTICE
entered in the trial court on April 12, 2010, denying his motion to modify No. 2010AP1665-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61910 - 2014-09-15
entered in the trial court on April 12, 2010, denying his motion to modify No. 2010AP1665-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61910 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Janell R. S. v. J.R. S.
., and Roggensack, J. DYKMAN, P.J. This is an appeal from an order denying Janell S.’s post-trial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11715 - 2017-09-20
., and Roggensack, J. DYKMAN, P.J. This is an appeal from an order denying Janell S.’s post-trial motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11715 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
se from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 postconviction motion. He claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28680 - 2014-09-15
se from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 postconviction motion. He claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28680 - 2014-09-15
Janell R. S. v. J.R. S.
. This is an appeal from an order denying Janell S.’s post-trial motion to deny J.R. S.’s physical placement rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11715 - 2005-03-31
. This is an appeal from an order denying Janell S.’s post-trial motion to deny J.R. S.’s physical placement rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11715 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2009-10)1 postconviction motion. 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90616 - 2014-09-15
. § 974.06 (2009-10)1 postconviction motion. 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90616 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order summarily denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10)[1] postconviction motion. He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90616 - 2012-12-18
from an order summarily denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10)[1] postconviction motion. He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90616 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion brought under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023- 24).1 We affirm on the ground that the claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970828 - 2025-06-19
postconviction motion brought under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2023- 24).1 We affirm on the ground that the claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970828 - 2025-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Cole argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion to amend his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268823 - 2020-07-14
). Cole argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion to amend his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268823 - 2020-07-14
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
? Whether the allegations of a defendant’s § 974.06 motion were sufficient to require a new trial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207182 - 2018-01-16
? Whether the allegations of a defendant’s § 974.06 motion were sufficient to require a new trial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207182 - 2018-01-16
[PDF]
State v. Terry Griffith
guilty. ¶4 In a postconviction motion, Griffith argued that he did not receive effective assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17384 - 2017-09-21
guilty. ¶4 In a postconviction motion, Griffith argued that he did not receive effective assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17384 - 2017-09-21