Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36131 - 36140 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 36131 - 36140 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was ineffective for not challenging trial counsel’s effectiveness. We follow a two-part test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49029 - 2014-09-15
was ineffective for not challenging trial counsel’s effectiveness. We follow a two-part test for ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant has not proven one prong of this test, it need not address the other. Id. at 697. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160148 - 2017-09-21
the defendant has not proven one prong of this test, it need not address the other. Id. at 697. Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160148 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1968)). ¶12 “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257735 - 2020-04-14
(1968)). ¶12 “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257735 - 2020-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 599 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1999) (setting forth the test for harmless error). The court did not rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
, 599 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1999) (setting forth the test for harmless error). The court did not rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
State v. Gary O. McKenzie
a “manifest injustice.” Id. “The ‘manifest injustice’ test requires a defendant to show a serious flaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26196 - 2006-08-14
a “manifest injustice.” Id. “The ‘manifest injustice’ test requires a defendant to show a serious flaw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26196 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. We need not address both aspects of the Strickland test if the defendant does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119209 - 2014-08-11
in the outcome.” Id. at 694. We need not address both aspects of the Strickland test if the defendant does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119209 - 2014-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
the deficient performance and prejudice prongs of the ineffective assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
the deficient performance and prejudice prongs of the ineffective assistance of counsel test. See Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
[PDF]
State v. Darryl D. Johnson
. For a defendant to prevail on an ineffective-assistance-of- counsel claim, the two-pronged test set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11785 - 2017-09-20
. For a defendant to prevail on an ineffective-assistance-of- counsel claim, the two-pronged test set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11785 - 2017-09-20
State v. Dustin A. Cummings
. Id. “The test for failure to sever thus turns to an analysis of other crimes evidence under Whitty v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24710 - 2006-04-04
. Id. “The test for failure to sever thus turns to an analysis of other crimes evidence under Whitty v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24710 - 2006-04-04
State v. Robert P. Behm
the legislature has made irrational or arbitrary classifications. Id. The test is not whether the classification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2005-03-31
the legislature has made irrational or arbitrary classifications. Id. The test is not whether the classification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13697 - 2005-03-31