Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36131 - 36140 of 46967 for show's.
Search results 36131 - 36140 of 46967 for show's.
State v. Kevin McCraney
). “This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2005-03-31
). “This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
results only showed he could not be excluded as the contributor from a group of persons of unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36107 - 2009-04-06
results only showed he could not be excluded as the contributor from a group of persons of unknown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36107 - 2009-04-06
State v. Eddie L. Thomas
the ‘prejudice’ requirement, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31
the ‘prejudice’ requirement, the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15353 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Postsentencing, a defendant must show that plea withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
. Postsentencing, a defendant must show that plea withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
as a sex offender.” ¶12 This evidence bears directly on the issues in the case because it shows Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35146 - 2005-04-12
as a sex offender.” ¶12 This evidence bears directly on the issues in the case because it shows Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35146 - 2005-04-12
CA Blank Order
in the United States, and Brown could not show that his plea is likely to result in deportation. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110573 - 2014-04-22
in the United States, and Brown could not show that his plea is likely to result in deportation. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110573 - 2014-04-22
COURT OF APPEALS
that the Department calculated the credit to apply through March 17, 2009. The State asserts that records will show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81587 - 2012-04-30
that the Department calculated the credit to apply through March 17, 2009. The State asserts that records will show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81587 - 2012-04-30
State v. Malcolm B. Rush
the jury’s verdict because, he contends, the State made no showing of his intent to persuade or prevent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6711 - 2005-03-31
the jury’s verdict because, he contends, the State made no showing of his intent to persuade or prevent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6711 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth D. Swenson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
at showing how the evidence failed to satisfy the Brantner test. Because that test is concerned with what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2010-07-29
at showing how the evidence failed to satisfy the Brantner test. Because that test is concerned with what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15808 - 2010-07-29
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
, 32. She claims, “the record does not contain sufficient facts or evidence tending to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31
, 32. She claims, “the record does not contain sufficient facts or evidence tending to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3920 - 2005-03-31