Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36131 - 36140 of 83123 for simple case search.
Search results 36131 - 36140 of 83123 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 The replevin order was granted by the Honorable Glenn H. Yamahiro in Milwaukee County Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226494 - 2018-11-06
2 The replevin order was granted by the Honorable Glenn H. Yamahiro in Milwaukee County Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226494 - 2018-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Malinowski
in the military. The juror did not know that the man he spoke with had any connection with the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5705 - 2017-09-19
in the military. The juror did not know that the man he spoke with had any connection with the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5705 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197872 - 2017-10-12
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 Because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197872 - 2017-10-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
both appeals. ¶2 The procedural history of these cases is complex, but the facts are not disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26911 - 2014-09-15
both appeals. ¶2 The procedural history of these cases is complex, but the facts are not disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26911 - 2014-09-15
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2001
2001 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32 - 2005-03-31
2001 COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nate Wilson
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
sentencing in a drug case.[2] We affirm the order. ¶2 Wilson was convicted as a repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4036 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the mitigating circumstances in this case, including the fact that Madison did not organize or plan the crime, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86886 - 2012-09-10
the mitigating circumstances in this case, including the fact that Madison did not organize or plan the crime, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86886 - 2012-09-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Unaware of the prior conviction in North Dakota, Pierce County charged the case as a civil forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26883 - 2014-09-15
. Unaware of the prior conviction in North Dakota, Pierce County charged the case as a civil forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26883 - 2014-09-15
Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
Certification
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02
. Rule 809.61 (2005-06)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29567 - 2007-07-02