Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36141 - 36150 of 57351 for id.
Search results 36141 - 36150 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, or under the laws of the United States.” See id.; see also § 943.80. The instruction includes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340785 - 2021-02-24
, or under the laws of the United States.” See id.; see also § 943.80. The instruction includes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=340785 - 2021-02-24
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Lindsey
legal standards.” Id. Based on the record, this court is satisfied that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
legal standards.” Id. Based on the record, this court is satisfied that the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
John R. Ammerman v. Adams County Board of Adjustment
that the Board’s decision is correct and valid. Id. at 253, 469 N.W.2d at 833. The Board, and not the reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13123 - 2005-03-31
that the Board’s decision is correct and valid. Id. at 253, 469 N.W.2d at 833. The Board, and not the reviewing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13123 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enhancement because Ray was a habitual criminal based on his prior drug conviction. Id. at 871-74. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223640 - 2018-10-17
enhancement because Ray was a habitual criminal based on his prior drug conviction. Id. at 871-74. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223640 - 2018-10-17
State v. Francisco Mata
of the statute itself. Id. If the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we do not resort to extrinsic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9054 - 2005-03-31
of the statute itself. Id. If the statutory language is clear and unambiguous, we do not resort to extrinsic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9054 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s discretion. Id. at 525. A court properly exercises its discretion by applying accepted legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31659 - 2014-09-15
court’s discretion. Id. at 525. A court properly exercises its discretion by applying accepted legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31659 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Cesar Flores-Ramirez
, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. If there is a possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7182 - 2017-09-20
, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id. If there is a possibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7182 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of these prongs defeats her claim. See id. at 697. We will uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217987 - 2018-08-21
of these prongs defeats her claim. See id. at 697. We will uphold the circuit court’s findings of fact unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217987 - 2018-08-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
% minimum extended supervision requirement.” Id., 322 Wis. 2d 737, ¶11. The second case, State v. Ash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99723 - 2014-09-15
% minimum extended supervision requirement.” Id., 322 Wis. 2d 737, ¶11. The second case, State v. Ash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99723 - 2014-09-15
State v. Theresa M. Sobacki
challenging the statute shows that the statute is unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31
challenging the statute shows that the statute is unconstitutional beyond a reasonable doubt. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16025 - 2005-03-31