Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36171 - 36180 of 52058 for legal separation.
Search results 36171 - 36180 of 52058 for legal separation.
Peter P. Karoblis v. Stanley Sternberg
. Although we review a trial court's legal conclusions de novo, Newhouse v. Citizens Security Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10398 - 2005-03-31
. Although we review a trial court's legal conclusions de novo, Newhouse v. Citizens Security Mut. Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a blood ethanol content of 0.197 grams per 100 milliliters—more than twice the legal limit for driving
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191803 - 2017-09-21
a blood ethanol content of 0.197 grams per 100 milliliters—more than twice the legal limit for driving
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191803 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determination is upheld if a trial court logically interpreted the facts, applied the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212015 - 2018-05-01
determination is upheld if a trial court logically interpreted the facts, applied the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212015 - 2018-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a Batson challenge is not necessarily deficient performance in every case where the legal basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282259 - 2020-08-27
a Batson challenge is not necessarily deficient performance in every case where the legal basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282259 - 2020-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “A [trial] court erroneously exercises its discretion when it applies an incorrect legal standard to newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489199 - 2022-03-01
. “A [trial] court erroneously exercises its discretion when it applies an incorrect legal standard to newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=489199 - 2022-03-01
Ernie Lessard v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
is coupled with some element of identifiable change or extension, the enlargement will invalidate a legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4568 - 2005-03-31
is coupled with some element of identifiable change or extension, the enlargement will invalidate a legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4568 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Whistle B. Currier v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of to “file” is: [T]o deliver (as a legal paper or instrument) after complying with any condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20599 - 2017-09-21
of to “file” is: [T]o deliver (as a legal paper or instrument) after complying with any condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20599 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 57
1038, ¶¶10, 13. We give varying amounts of deference to agency legal conclusions. Brown v. LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80369 - 2014-09-15
1038, ¶¶10, 13. We give varying amounts of deference to agency legal conclusions. Brown v. LIRC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80369 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Pamela R. Obey v. Thomas J. Halloin, M.D.
and the relevant standard of review. The determination of the applicable legal standard and the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15439 - 2017-09-21
and the relevant standard of review. The determination of the applicable legal standard and the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and a conclusion based on the application of the correct legal standard. “We will not reverse a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241005 - 2019-05-23
, and a conclusion based on the application of the correct legal standard. “We will not reverse a discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241005 - 2019-05-23