Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36181 - 36190 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36181 - 36190 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
is frivolous. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.25(3). Their motion was untimely because it was filed after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29369 - 2014-09-15
is frivolous. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.25(3). Their motion was untimely because it was filed after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29369 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutionally ineffective assistance “cannot be reviewed on appeal absent a postconviction motion in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136384 - 2015-03-02
constitutionally ineffective assistance “cannot be reviewed on appeal absent a postconviction motion in the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136384 - 2015-03-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals the order denying his postcommitment motion.1 Stokes contends that: (1) his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28157 - 2014-09-15
appeals the order denying his postcommitment motion.1 Stokes contends that: (1) his constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28157 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
violent person. He also appeals the order denying his postcommitment motion.[1] Stokes contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28157 - 2007-02-20
violent person. He also appeals the order denying his postcommitment motion.[1] Stokes contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28157 - 2007-02-20
State v. Antoine D. Edwards
Edwards pled guilty, Antoine Edwards filed a postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. § 809.30 seeking a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21736 - 2006-03-13
Edwards pled guilty, Antoine Edwards filed a postconviction motion under Wis. Stat. § 809.30 seeking a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21736 - 2006-03-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Specifically, Elaine Strassburg challenges the circuit court’s denial of her contempt motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825089 - 2024-07-11
. Specifically, Elaine Strassburg challenges the circuit court’s denial of her contempt motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825089 - 2024-07-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. No. 2018AP186-CR 2 ¶2 Walker sought a new trial for three reasons. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228350 - 2018-11-27
postconviction motion. No. 2018AP186-CR 2 ¶2 Walker sought a new trial for three reasons. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228350 - 2018-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. Langlois argues that she is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erred by: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79065 - 2012-03-18
postconviction motion. Langlois argues that she is entitled to a new trial because the trial court erred by: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79065 - 2012-03-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denied the Maclays’ motion to dismiss Lindemann’s action, erroneously found that the water system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192292 - 2017-09-21
denied the Maclays’ motion to dismiss Lindemann’s action, erroneously found that the water system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192292 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion for recusal on May 8, 2023, which the circuit court judge denied. McCune’s motion argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26
a motion for recusal on May 8, 2023, which the circuit court judge denied. McCune’s motion argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000714 - 2025-08-26