Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36181 - 36190 of 83349 for case search.
Search results 36181 - 36190 of 83349 for case search.
CA Blank Order
of the plea bargain, which resolved both the proceeding underlying this appeal, Milwaukee County case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98134 - 2013-06-10
of the plea bargain, which resolved both the proceeding underlying this appeal, Milwaukee County case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98134 - 2013-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98455 - 2013-06-25
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98455 - 2013-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
are not permitted in traffic forfeiture cases. The State also contended Heupher’s factual assertions were trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76321 - 2012-01-09
are not permitted in traffic forfeiture cases. The State also contended Heupher’s factual assertions were trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76321 - 2012-01-09
State v. Paul E. Kimmes
v. Smith, 122 Wis.2d 431, 434, 362 N.W.2d 439, 441 (Ct. App. 1984), a case with identical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13129 - 2005-03-31
v. Smith, 122 Wis.2d 431, 434, 362 N.W.2d 439, 441 (Ct. App. 1984), a case with identical facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13129 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, this court concludes that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735751 - 2023-12-05
and record, this court concludes that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=735751 - 2023-12-05
State v. Shelbie Sue Schultz
. Additionally, she argues that this has prejudiced her case because had she been aware of the witness, she could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12429 - 2005-03-31
. Additionally, she argues that this has prejudiced her case because had she been aware of the witness, she could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12429 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis J. Millard
-38. In this case, the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, therefore it is only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5988 - 2005-03-31
-38. In this case, the trial court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, therefore it is only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5988 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frederick N.
, including Mr. N., that they “must appear at every court case. If you fail to appear, the Court will find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5128 - 2005-03-31
, including Mr. N., that they “must appear at every court case. If you fail to appear, the Court will find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles R.P.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2353 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12887 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-2353 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12887 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David L.W.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0606 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12151 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-0606 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12151 - 2017-09-21