Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36181 - 36190 of 58826 for dos.

State v. Jovan T. Mull
to raise these issues on direct appeal, despite Mull’s request that he do so. Because an assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6794 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Supreme Court Statistics December
before the Court of Appeals has had the opportunity to do so. This type of request is typically made
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1067638 - 2026-01-21

[PDF] Supreme Court Statistics August 2024
the opportunity to do so. This type of request is typically made when the Court of Appeals believes
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849428 - 2024-09-10

[PDF] Supreme Court Statistics December 2023
before the Court of Appeals has had the opportunity to do so. This type of request is typically made
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762009 - 2024-02-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
about the rate of alcohol absorption—that he was under the influence of an intoxicant when doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841908 - 2024-08-28

[PDF] State v. John S. Spicer
transcript. Nor do we think that Spicer would have avoided the cross-examination if he had access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21627 - 2017-09-21

State v. James J. Wardell
by the objective standard of what a reasonably prudent attorney would do in similar circumstances. Id. at 636-37
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10653 - 2005-03-31

James P. Brennan v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
by the trial court: Mr. Brennan became an independent contractor as an attorney employed by or doing business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13351 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Hector Cubero v. Dan Buchler
it as he is required to do. However, the record does not bear out Cubero's assertion. It shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8239 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to testify immediately but is not required to do so. The statute mandates that the court order the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849066 - 2024-09-18