Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3621 - 3630 of 6253 for cf.

State v. Matthew Tyler
. Appeal No. 02-2571-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-3013 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5702 - 2005-03-31

WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1650 Complete Title of...
concerns for its employee. Cf. Linzmeyer, 254 Wis. 2d 306, ¶30 (noting that concern for the safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111596 - 2014-06-24

[PDF] State v. James A. H.
source. Cf. United States v. Cojab, 978 F.2d 341, 343 (7th Cir. 1992) (holding that district court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4070 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Paul L. Polak
. Appeal No. 01-1873-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00-CF-449 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4172 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Joseph F. Jiles
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 02-0153-CR Cir. Ct. No. 00 CF 2479 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4841 - 2017-09-19

State v. Derrick Sandles
. Appeal No. 02-2622-CR Cir. Ct. No. 01 CF 4181 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5719 - 2005-03-31

Oneida County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
that the statute is ambiguous. In the absence of ambiguity, we do not refer to legislative history. Cf. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2280 - 2005-03-31

State v. Roger P. Barber
intent when he touched the screen. Cf. State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis.2d 583, 593, 493 N.W.2d 367, 372
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13447 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
are not persuaded by the Nelsons’ reliance on Broderick. Cf. Haines v. Haines, 39 Cal. Rptr. 2d 673, 683 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45163 - 2009-12-29

State v. Anthony J. Dentici, Jr.
). But cf. Magnuson, 2000 WI 19 at ¶¶42-43. In Sevelin, the trial court granted the defendant, Sevelin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4110 - 2005-03-31