Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3621 - 3630 of 74925 for public records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
exercised its discretion when it determined it would be contrary to T.D.M.’s and the public’s best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165628 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Charles E. Melton
excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20582 - 2017-09-21

State v. Charles E. Melton
disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20582 - 2005-12-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
interests of the juvenile or the public on the record after it considered the factors. The court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134447 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
in juvenile court is contrary to the best interests of the juvenile or the public on the record after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134447 - 2015-02-10

[PDF] State v. James Gruentzel
of those standards, demonstrating the exercise of discretion, must be set forth on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of his dental office staff. Upon reviewing the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264346 - 2020-06-17

State v. James Gruentzel
forth on the record at sentencing. The supreme court reiterated that sentencing is left
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6934 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dorothy Drake v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
the impact of erosion. Because the Board’s factual determinations are adequately supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25313 - 2017-09-21

Dorothy Drake v. Burnett County Board of Adjustment
supported by the record and the Board applied the correct legal standards, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25313 - 2006-05-30