Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36201 - 36210 of 56115 for so.

State v. Leonard E. Wille
the arrest. But even if Milbach had done so and established that the vehicle was then inoperable, such would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14606 - 2005-03-31

State v. Troy W. Jackson
are: (1) causing the death of another person; and (2) doing so with the intent to kill that person. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8732 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kyle J. Gierach
if “in the circumstances of a particular case evidence of a complainant’s prior sexual conduct may be so relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14838 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dennis B. Robinson
manufactured by General Motors.” Robinson has not filed a reply brief disputing this assertion, so we take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3343 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the bloodstream may support a finding of exigent circumstances in a specific case, “it does not do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133096 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James C. Dillard, Sr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
officer who entered his cell, where the battery occurred, was not authorized to do so. Even assuming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4857 - 2017-09-19

Nancy Koch v. P. A. Bergner & Company
credible evidence,” then the circuit court is “clearly wrong” in doing so. When there is any credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9163 - 2005-03-31

Harold Carlson Trust v. St. Croix County
,” the ordinance does not define the time, mode and occasion for the duty’s performance so as to remove all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2539 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kathleen Barry-Chamberlain v. Department of Industry
) so required. We agree. Therefore, we do not decide whether petitioner could select the family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7974 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Malcolm J. Campbell
decision, which the court reporter incorrectly transcribed is not so ambiguous that we must reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7937 - 2017-09-19