Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36211 - 36220 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 36211 - 36220 of 83389 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
The terms of the plea agreement here were attached to the plea questionnaire which included the case numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38151 - 2009-07-22
The terms of the plea agreement here were attached to the plea questionnaire which included the case numbers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38151 - 2009-07-22
[PDF]
State v. Harlan L. Horswill
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
in this case. The court observed that Horswill’s defense in this case was that the touchings may have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12072 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph M. Malinowski
in the military. The juror did not know that the man he spoke with had any connection with the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5705 - 2017-09-19
in the military. The juror did not know that the man he spoke with had any connection with the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5705 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2018AP389
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227982 - 2018-11-28
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2018AP389
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227982 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP1380 Cir. Ct. No. 2004CV12
certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its review and determination
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29567 - 2014-09-15
certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its review and determination
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29567 - 2014-09-15
Wendy Enright v. Pleasant View Ltd. Partnerships
. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] In a previous case before this court, we decided that Wendy Enright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16186 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 ANDERSON, J.[1] In a previous case before this court, we decided that Wendy Enright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16186 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah J. Burch
, that the facts in this case be as “egregious” as those in other reported cases, such as Waldner. The proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2478 - 2005-03-31
, that the facts in this case be as “egregious” as those in other reported cases, such as Waldner. The proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wade L.
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. Further, this case was placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9106 - 2017-09-19
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), STATS. Further, this case was placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9106 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Supreme Court case law. Based upon our review 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09
Supreme Court case law. Based upon our review 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=450872 - 2021-11-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356008 - 2021-04-14
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=356008 - 2021-04-14