Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36241 - 36250 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36241 - 36250 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction over Matel’s person due to defective service. The trial court denied Matel’s motion, and Matel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64697 - 2011-05-23
jurisdiction over Matel’s person due to defective service. The trial court denied Matel’s motion, and Matel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64697 - 2011-05-23
[PDF]
Donn S. Jacobson v. Allied Crop Agency, Inc.
him and Allied. We therefore turn to Allied's motion. To support its motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7702 - 2017-09-19
him and Allied. We therefore turn to Allied's motion. To support its motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7702 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
misused its sentencing discretion; and (3) whether the circuit court erred when it denied Brown’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106031 - 2017-09-21
misused its sentencing discretion; and (3) whether the circuit court erred when it denied Brown’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106031 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
arrested for OWI. ¶4 Senger filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that Schulteis did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76600 - 2012-01-17
arrested for OWI. ¶4 Senger filed a motion to suppress evidence, arguing that Schulteis did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76600 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
to grant relief based on “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” but only if a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31024 - 2014-09-15
to grant relief based on “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” but only if a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by failing to file a motion for a mistrial prior to sentencing; whether Young knowingly waived his right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744749 - 2023-12-28
by failing to file a motion for a mistrial prior to sentencing; whether Young knowingly waived his right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744749 - 2023-12-28
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 943.10(1m)(a) (2005-06).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42671 - 2009-10-26
. § 943.10(1m)(a) (2005-06).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42671 - 2009-10-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by failing to file a motion for a mistrial prior to sentencing; whether Young knowingly waived his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744749 - 2023-12-28
by failing to file a motion for a mistrial prior to sentencing; whether Young knowingly waived his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744749 - 2023-12-28
State v. Philip P. Sheahan
weapon. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7236 - 2005-03-31
weapon. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7236 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying Bucholtz’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22
suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude that the circuit court did not err in denying Bucholtz’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29106 - 2007-05-22