Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36251 - 36260 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36251 - 36260 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Lindsey
the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his postconviction motion for sentence reduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his postconviction motion for sentence reduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
State v. William James, Jr.
., appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial based on an ineffective-assistance-of-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8472 - 2005-03-31
., appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial based on an ineffective-assistance-of-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Columbia County v. Gary O. Kloostra
in violation of a Columbia County ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3970 - 2017-09-20
in violation of a Columbia County ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3970 - 2017-09-20
State v. Patrick R. Bell
suppression motion. This court affirms.[2] At approximately 9:45 a.m., on Monday
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12929 - 2005-03-31
suppression motion. This court affirms.[2] At approximately 9:45 a.m., on Monday
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12929 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of his suppression motion. The issue is whether the lineup at which he was identified was impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39847 - 2009-08-24
of his suppression motion. The issue is whether the lineup at which he was identified was impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39847 - 2009-08-24
CA Blank Order
a timely notice of appeal, Marqurs filed a motion for postjudgment relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136865 - 2015-03-10
a timely notice of appeal, Marqurs filed a motion for postjudgment relief pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 806.07(1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136865 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests. Senger was subsequently arrested for OWI. ¶4 Senger filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76600 - 2014-09-15
sobriety tests. Senger was subsequently arrested for OWI. ¶4 Senger filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76600 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Niebuhr also argues that the circuit court erred by denying her motion for a directed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083370 - 2026-03-03
. Niebuhr also argues that the circuit court erred by denying her motion for a directed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083370 - 2026-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
robbery and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Skenandore argues that his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68247 - 2011-07-19
robbery and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Skenandore argues that his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68247 - 2011-07-19
[PDF]
Melissa Ertz Rogge v. Paul Aaron Rogge
conclude Melissa Rogge’s motion for “clarification” should have been treated as a motion to revise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
conclude Melissa Rogge’s motion for “clarification” should have been treated as a motion to revise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19