Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36251 - 36260 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Donald E. Powers
the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 436-37 (1984). Statements given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12706 - 2005-03-31

Janell R. S. v. J.R. S.
hearing, the court heard closing statements. The court then gave its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11715 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph Williams
, and his failure to recall Green’s exact statements. The trial court concluded, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11239 - 2005-03-31

State v. Walter P. VanDeMortel
. Nevertheless, VanDeMortel argues that, despite the officers’ statements, the fact that he was transferred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13969 - 2005-03-31

Community National Bank v. Medical Benefit Administrators, LLC
is trying to establish, and it cites no authority for its statement. [9] The record on appeal does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16220 - 2005-03-31

Amy Jo Humphreys v. Roy G. Bridgeman
percent of that particular property, including lakefront property” and that he understood that statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15937 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 29, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cou...
the court was including Joseph S. in its “no further actions” statement, as she had previously named all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71713 - 2015-07-14

[PDF] Susan K. Defoe v. Jodi L. Sigrist
by the trial court’s admission of several statements and exhibits from Defoe. Specifically, she contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4938 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Larenzo M.C.
, or between his trial testimony and his previous statements, that fact in itself does not result
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6819 - 2017-09-20

State v. Robert Johnson
concedes that neither the complaint nor the plea hearing statements provide a factual predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8487 - 2005-03-31