Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36251 - 36260 of 50524 for our.
Search results 36251 - 36260 of 50524 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
allow that and I thought it was bad for our defense.” ¶22 Hare glosses over the question of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117781 - 2014-07-28
allow that and I thought it was bad for our defense.” ¶22 Hare glosses over the question of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117781 - 2014-07-28
State v. Shaun P. Lynch
Our review of whether a plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15203 - 2005-04-26
Our review of whether a plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15203 - 2005-04-26
State v. Ernest E. Halford
at 212. ¶13 Our standard of review for a waiver of counsel is mixed. We will independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2394 - 2005-09-01
at 212. ¶13 Our standard of review for a waiver of counsel is mixed. We will independently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2394 - 2005-09-01
State v. Michael D. Kollmann
admissible does not end our analysis because trial counsel did not counter it. ¶28 We consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7184 - 2005-03-31
admissible does not end our analysis because trial counsel did not counter it. ¶28 We consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7184 - 2005-03-31
State v. Marques D. Miller
, 548 N.W.2d 50, 54 (1996). ¶11 Our standard for reviewing this claim involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2005-04-24
, 548 N.W.2d 50, 54 (1996). ¶11 Our standard for reviewing this claim involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2005-04-24
State v. Kevin Spinks
, 167 Wis.2d at 767, 482 N.W.2d at 889. Our review is limited to determining whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11997 - 2005-03-31
, 167 Wis.2d at 767, 482 N.W.2d at 889. Our review is limited to determining whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11997 - 2005-03-31
Barron County v. Kathy S.
was not prejudiced. ¶14 Our courts have reversed judgments pursuant to § 752.35, Stats., when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15970 - 2013-10-28
was not prejudiced. ¶14 Our courts have reversed judgments pursuant to § 752.35, Stats., when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15970 - 2013-10-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 527 (1974). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the circuit court “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181189 - 2017-09-21
.2d 527 (1974). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the circuit court “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181189 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was “a significant danger.” Our review of the sentencing transcript leads us to conclude that there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219631 - 2018-09-20
was “a significant danger.” Our review of the sentencing transcript leads us to conclude that there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219631 - 2018-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, § 11.4). “Our supreme court has recognized this protection as ‘one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767596 - 2024-02-22
, § 11.4). “Our supreme court has recognized this protection as ‘one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767596 - 2024-02-22