Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36271 - 36280 of 76552 for judgment for u s.

[PDF] State v. Donald D. Mentzel
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Fond du Lac County: JOHN W. MICKIEWICZ, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8159 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John Casteel
the judgment. Nos. 00-2852 00-2853 4 ¶5 After his direct appeals, Casteel filed eight appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3170 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] William W. Marquardt v. Milwaukee County
thereafter exempted the 15% from the setoff provisions. Marquardt then filed a summary judgment motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3557 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 181
¶4 Both Sierra Club and WPSC moved for summary judgment. The administrative law judge (ALJ) denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29515 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 53
-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Craig S. Powell of Kohler & Hart, S.C., of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94228 - 2014-09-15

WI App 53 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1291-CR Complete Tit...
: On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Craig S. Powell of Kohler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94228 - 2013-04-23

[PDF] WI APP 2
, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=466532 - 2022-02-10

COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45960 - 2010-01-19

John C. Koshick a/k/a Jack Koshick v. State
money after a judgment finding that money was owed. Koshick relies on Harrigan v. Gilchrist, 121 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19546 - 2008-04-21

State v. John Casteel
exercised its discretion in sentencing Casteel. Id. at 1-5. We affirmed the judgment. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3171 - 2005-03-31