Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36271 - 36280 of 83479 for simple case search.
Search results 36271 - 36280 of 83479 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865811 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2018AP389
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227982 - 2018-11-28
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2018AP389
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227982 - 2018-11-28
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
filed a second unitemized request for $15, “for the expenses he incurred during this case.” On November
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454294 - 2021-11-23
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454294 - 2021-11-23
COURT OF APPEALS
as the applicability of Dubose is concerned, Dubose was not pending during Brown’s case; trial counsel was not obliged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50284 - 2010-05-24
as the applicability of Dubose is concerned, Dubose was not pending during Brown’s case; trial counsel was not obliged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50284 - 2010-05-24
State v. Terry A. Givens
. She claims the trial court erred in denying her motion made at the close of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11264 - 2005-03-31
. She claims the trial court erred in denying her motion made at the close of the State's case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11264 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James O'Neil
county circuit court addressed to Attorney O'Neil, but it found no record of the case in which he had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16968 - 2017-09-21
county circuit court addressed to Attorney O'Neil, but it found no record of the case in which he had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16968 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
both of the cases against him with a State recommendation of ten years initial confinement with ten
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354934 - 2021-04-13
both of the cases against him with a State recommendation of ten years initial confinement with ten
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354934 - 2021-04-13
State v. Wade L.
. THE CLERK: December 8th, two o'clock, Branch 9 case, initial appearance. [COUNSEL]: I -- Well, I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9106 - 2005-03-31
. THE CLERK: December 8th, two o'clock, Branch 9 case, initial appearance. [COUNSEL]: I -- Well, I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9106 - 2005-03-31