Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3631 - 3640 of 62305 for child support.
Search results 3631 - 3640 of 62305 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
on a stipulation the parents entered into at the time child support was established. Around January 1, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26698 - 2006-10-09
on a stipulation the parents entered into at the time child support was established. Around January 1, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26698 - 2006-10-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
lived with his mother based on a stipulation the parents entered into at the time child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26698 - 2014-09-15
lived with his mother based on a stipulation the parents entered into at the time child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26698 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
the terms of child support and maintenance between Searing and her former spouse, Thomas Jetzer. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144487 - 2015-07-12
the terms of child support and maintenance between Searing and her former spouse, Thomas Jetzer. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144487 - 2015-07-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or support for the child and whether, with respect to a person who is or may be the father of the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72888 - 2014-09-15
or support for the child and whether, with respect to a person who is or may be the father of the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72888 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert Bass, Jr.
, for first-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to § 948.02(1), Stats., and from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10957 - 2005-03-31
, for first-degree sexual assault of a child, contrary to § 948.02(1), Stats., and from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10957 - 2005-03-31
Certification
a child for more than 12 hours” supported his interpretation because it “shows that the legislature
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73854 - 2011-11-15
a child for more than 12 hours” supported his interpretation because it “shows that the legislature
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73854 - 2011-11-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2514-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF120
. No. 2010AP2514-CR 4 claimed that the language “withholds a child for more than 12 hours” supported his
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73854 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2010AP2514-CR 4 claimed that the language “withholds a child for more than 12 hours” supported his
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73854 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
parental rights to her child, A.S. J.C. contends that testimony taken at her fact finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210220 - 2018-03-27
parental rights to her child, A.S. J.C. contends that testimony taken at her fact finding hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210220 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II LITTLE HANDS CHILD CARE PLAINTIFF- RESPONDENT, V
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34079 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II LITTLE HANDS CHILD CARE PLAINTIFF- RESPONDENT, V
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34079 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment for $1942 plus costs. He contends that Little Hands Child Care never submitted supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34079 - 2008-09-23
judgment for $1942 plus costs. He contends that Little Hands Child Care never submitted supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34079 - 2008-09-23