Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3631 - 3640 of 58458 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Anthony K. Murphy
from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26099 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Alan L. Gillette v. Nicole M. Gillette
the trial court’s maintenance award and property division. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 The determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25488 - 2017-09-21

Dawn M. Sabel v. Martin E. Rosenthal
. Rosenthal claims the trial court erred in numerous respects when it failed to order the Sabels to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2784 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dawn M. Sabel v. Martin E. Rosenthal
to him in the amount of $5,523. Rosenthal claims the trial court erred in numerous respects when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2784 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
order denying her motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34707 - 2008-11-24

Kim DeValk v. Patricia A. Vadnais
. Following the court commissioner’s issuance of an injunction, Vadnais moved the trial court for a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16338 - 2005-03-31

State v. Charles V. Royster
that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion when it sentenced him to the maximum term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that motion could be heard, Bohannon entered a plea agreement with the State. At the plea hearing, trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125370 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ruben F. Herrera
while armed with a dangerous weapon, party to the crime, following a jury trial. He also appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7987 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kim DeValk v. Patricia A. Vadnais
issuance of an injunction, Vadnais moved the trial court for a de novo review. An evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16338 - 2017-09-21