Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36301 - 36310 of 39838 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 36301 - 36310 of 39838 for financial disclosure statement.
William J. Keefe v. Ronald A. Arthur
court] never conducted a full hearing thereon per his own sworn statements, and that in any event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19964 - 2005-10-17
court] never conducted a full hearing thereon per his own sworn statements, and that in any event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19964 - 2005-10-17
[PDF]
Sheri D. Meyers v. Patrick Schultz
to 7 Meyers cites Druecker v. Salomon, 21 Wis. 621 (1867), for a later statement that “[i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7334 - 2017-09-20
to 7 Meyers cites Druecker v. Salomon, 21 Wis. 621 (1867), for a later statement that “[i]t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7334 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Cardoso’s statements were insufficient to signal to the court that she was raising the issue of personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130922 - 2017-09-21
that Cardoso’s statements were insufficient to signal to the court that she was raising the issue of personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the confluence of Singh’s statements to Moore about facing an “all-white jury,” coupled with his failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476526 - 2022-01-25
that the confluence of Singh’s statements to Moore about facing an “all-white jury,” coupled with his failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476526 - 2022-01-25
COURT OF APPEALS
of an alleged fact not in the record.” He takes issue with the court’s statement during the December 8, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78931 - 2012-03-05
of an alleged fact not in the record.” He takes issue with the court’s statement during the December 8, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78931 - 2012-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Jimmie Davison
to § 940.19 is incorrect. ¶20 Based on the clear statement provided in WIS. STAT. § 939.66(2m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3768 - 2017-09-19
to § 940.19 is incorrect. ¶20 Based on the clear statement provided in WIS. STAT. § 939.66(2m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3768 - 2017-09-19
State v. Carl C. Martin
that juror affidavits could not be received "as to any matter or statement occurring during the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7949 - 2005-03-31
that juror affidavits could not be received "as to any matter or statement occurring during the course
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7949 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court thus gave a sufficient “statement of reasons” for selecting consecutive terms. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30786 - 2007-11-05
. The court thus gave a sufficient “statement of reasons” for selecting consecutive terms. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30786 - 2007-11-05
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kenyota A.
with the court’s earlier statement that it was available on November 13. ¶23 Because Kenyota supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3873 - 2017-09-20
with the court’s earlier statement that it was available on November 13. ¶23 Because Kenyota supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3873 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Carl C. Martin
in this case, holding that juror affidavits could not be received "as to any matter or statement occurring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7949 - 2017-09-19
in this case, holding that juror affidavits could not be received "as to any matter or statement occurring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7949 - 2017-09-19