Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36301 - 36310 of 57365 for id.
Search results 36301 - 36310 of 57365 for id.
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s discretion. Id. at 525. A court properly exercises its discretion by applying accepted legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31659 - 2014-09-15
court’s discretion. Id. at 525. A court properly exercises its discretion by applying accepted legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31659 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
detention. Id. at 623-24. ¶8 The weight to be given to each of these factors is within the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33034 - 2014-09-15
detention. Id. at 623-24. ¶8 The weight to be given to each of these factors is within the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33034 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher Lloyd Robinson
court will not set aside the sentence for that reason. Id. at 282. The reviewing court is “obliged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19653 - 2005-09-19
court will not set aside the sentence for that reason. Id. at 282. The reviewing court is “obliged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19653 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the erroneous exercise of discretion standard. Id., ¶¶81-83, 112 (Abrahamson, C.J., concurring in part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986251 - 2025-07-23
the erroneous exercise of discretion standard. Id., ¶¶81-83, 112 (Abrahamson, C.J., concurring in part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986251 - 2025-07-23
2009 WI App 169
the obligation to “support his client’s appeal to the best of his ability.” Id. When counsel concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44483 - 2010-03-08
the obligation to “support his client’s appeal to the best of his ability.” Id. When counsel concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44483 - 2010-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not to be duplicatively credited to more than one of the sentences imposed to run consecutively. Id. Boettcher also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228699 - 2018-11-27
is not to be duplicatively credited to more than one of the sentences imposed to run consecutively. Id. Boettcher also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228699 - 2018-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
refusal to read testimony to the jury for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. “A circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60569 - 2011-02-28
refusal to read testimony to the jury for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. “A circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60569 - 2011-02-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
income for purposes of determining maintenance, id. at 20, we conclude that an asset, once depleted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74021 - 2014-09-15
income for purposes of determining maintenance, id. at 20, we conclude that an asset, once depleted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74021 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick D. Dawson
has committed, was committing, or is about to commit a crime; a “hunch” will not suffice. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2594 - 2017-09-19
has committed, was committing, or is about to commit a crime; a “hunch” will not suffice. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2594 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
with the normal uses of state facilities. See id., ¶28. The fact that the permitting rule covered very small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134344 - 2015-02-04
with the normal uses of state facilities. See id., ¶28. The fact that the permitting rule covered very small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134344 - 2015-02-04