Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36321 - 36330 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36321 - 36330 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Adam S. Witczak
. Witczak is appealing the denial of his motion to suppress all evidence derived from his detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13428 - 2005-03-31
. Witczak is appealing the denial of his motion to suppress all evidence derived from his detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ΒΆ1 PER CURIAM. Parnell T. Graham, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116991 - 2017-09-21
, JJ. ΒΆ1 PER CURIAM. Parnell T. Graham, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Philip P. Sheahan
and carrying a concealed weapon. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7236 - 2017-09-20
and carrying a concealed weapon. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7236 - 2017-09-20
State v. Robert M. James
(1)(a) (OWI). The issue on this appeal is whether the circuit court correctly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7652 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a) (OWI). The issue on this appeal is whether the circuit court correctly denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7652 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
for not filing pretrial motions challenging the bindover and the search and seizure of Wolfe. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
for not filing pretrial motions challenging the bindover and the search and seizure of Wolfe. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of his suppression motion. The issue is whether the lineup at which he was identified was impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39847 - 2009-08-24
of his suppression motion. The issue is whether the lineup at which he was identified was impermissibly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39847 - 2009-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
an award of $29,945.97 for past medical expenses. After trial, Lefler and Progressive filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110027 - 2014-04-09
an award of $29,945.97 for past medical expenses. After trial, Lefler and Progressive filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110027 - 2014-04-09
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Lindsey
the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his postconviction motion for sentence reduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his postconviction motion for sentence reduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2121 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary Curtis
in failing to cite case law in his motion to suppress the tapes and in failing to request an in camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
in failing to cite case law in his motion to suppress the tapes and in failing to request an in camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gary Curtis
. First, Curtis claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to cite case law in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11531 - 2013-05-07
. First, Curtis claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to cite case law in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11531 - 2013-05-07

