Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36341 - 36350 of 64663 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 36341 - 36350 of 64663 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669710 - 2023-06-20
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669710 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision or if it renders a decision not reasonably supported by the facts of record.” Id. In making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185736 - 2017-09-21
decision or if it renders a decision not reasonably supported by the facts of record.” Id. In making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185736 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jalaina M.F. v. Blake W.A.
.2d 85, 88 (Ct. App. 1996). Thus, if the record contains any credible evidence that, under any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13350 - 2017-09-21
.2d 85, 88 (Ct. App. 1996). Thus, if the record contains any credible evidence that, under any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13350 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of that charge. 2 At the postconviction motion hearing, the record was clarified to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175025 - 2017-09-21
of that charge. 2 At the postconviction motion hearing, the record was clarified to establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175025 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mitchell Miller
that a trial court articulate the basis for the sentence imposed on the facts of the record: “‘[T]here should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20327 - 2007-06-04
that a trial court articulate the basis for the sentence imposed on the facts of the record: “‘[T]here should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20327 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
Delmar F. Renak v. Raymond G. Feest
to make it a permanent accessory to the freehold? The Court can only conclude based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18876 - 2017-09-21
to make it a permanent accessory to the freehold? The Court can only conclude based on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18876 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Sanicki, Jr.
review of the record, however, we conclude that the original postconviction motion was necessarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20
review of the record, however, we conclude that the original postconviction motion was necessarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3808 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the record for any credible evidence that supports the jury’s findings. See id. Additionally, West did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2007-04-09
the record for any credible evidence that supports the jury’s findings. See id. Additionally, West did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28690 - 2007-04-09
State v. Howard C. Carter
demeanor demonstrated his impartiality is unsupported by the record. We could find no references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4338 - 2005-03-31
demeanor demonstrated his impartiality is unsupported by the record. We could find no references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4338 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). Rather, we must examine the record for any credible and substantial evidence that supports the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35129 - 2009-01-07
). Rather, we must examine the record for any credible and substantial evidence that supports the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35129 - 2009-01-07