Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36341 - 36350 of 58245 for speedy trial.

State v. Audrey A. Edmunds
of the child’s parents’ demeanors, a juror excused during the trial, and a jury instruction. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14327 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
is an exception to the general immunity for discretionary acts under WIS. STAT. §§ 893.80(4), the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6524 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
its numerous counterclaims against WHEDA, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60800 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Lori B. v. Steven B.
trial on the ground that the real controversy has not been fully tried. We reject each of Steven’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14663 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand for a new trial on Kekula’s informed consent claim. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125621 - 2014-11-03

City of Milwaukee Redevelopment Authority v. Veterans of Foreign Wars Post 2874
payments authorized by Wis. Stat. § 32.19, we agree with the trial court’s conclusion that “[t]he law does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5171 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
various other sources. Grimes’s trial counsel said that he was “inclined to advise Mr. Grimes that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
various other sources. Grimes’s trial counsel said that he was “inclined to advise Mr. Grimes that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1052508 - 2025-12-18

Douglass H. Bartley v. Tommy G. Thompson
thousand federal pensioners to proceed before the commission. We affirm the trial court's dismissal of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8307 - 2005-03-31

Earl Grunwald v. Community Development Authority of the City of West Allis
Area. He challenges West Allis's right to condemn his property under § 66.431, Stats. After the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9858 - 2005-03-31