Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36351 - 36360 of 51926 for him.
Search results 36351 - 36360 of 51926 for him.
State v. Norman R.
. was unable to attend to Sean’s simplest needs or even hold him when he would cry. Moreover, visits to Mrs. R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5323 - 2011-02-03
. was unable to attend to Sean’s simplest needs or even hold him when he would cry. Moreover, visits to Mrs. R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5323 - 2011-02-03
State v. Mark R. Norlander
PER CURIAM. Mark Norlander appeals a judgment convicting him of child enticement, contrary to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-06-06
PER CURIAM. Mark Norlander appeals a judgment convicting him of child enticement, contrary to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Roger Thorp appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of arson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
PER CURIAM. Roger Thorp appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of arson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38341 - 2009-07-27
State v. James E. Powell
-examination that he had difficulty remembering what was going on around him and that the robbery itself
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9475 - 2015-03-24
-examination that he had difficulty remembering what was going on around him and that the robbery itself
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9475 - 2015-03-24
Jens O. Luebow v. Wisconsin Department of Regulation & Licensing
but requiring the reduction of the $86,114.90 in costs imposed against him. Luebow cross-appeals pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3660 - 2005-03-31
but requiring the reduction of the $86,114.90 in costs imposed against him. Luebow cross-appeals pro se from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3660 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 134
it unfeasible for him to record the interrogation. “Feasible” in this context is not a synonym for “effortless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28
it unfeasible for him to record the interrogation. “Feasible” in this context is not a synonym for “effortless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
sentence; (5) penalizing him for his treatment needs; and (6) denying his sentence modification motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27307 - 2006-12-04
sentence; (5) penalizing him for his treatment needs; and (6) denying his sentence modification motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27307 - 2006-12-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
specialists. She testified that she would like to adopt him and is willing to help him build relationships
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210298 - 2018-03-23
specialists. She testified that she would like to adopt him and is willing to help him build relationships
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210298 - 2018-03-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a ‘Pro Se’ Motion for Sentence Credit” under WIS. STAT. § 973.155, with an additional argument for him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662117 - 2023-05-31
of a ‘Pro Se’ Motion for Sentence Credit” under WIS. STAT. § 973.155, with an additional argument for him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662117 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Virtis A.
was not re-established because “there was not consistent and constant contact with him.” Although he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20
was not re-established because “there was not consistent and constant contact with him.” Although he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6667 - 2017-09-20