Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36351 - 36360 of 81718 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

ABKA Limited Partnership v. Board of Review of the Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake
a circuit court order to uphold the 1996 and 1997 property tax assessments of the Abbey on Geneva Lake
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17377 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] ABKA Limited Partnership v. Board of Review of the Village of Fontana-On-Geneva Lake
a circuit court order to uphold the 1996 and 1997 property tax assessments of the Abbey on Geneva Lake
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17377 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waushara County: DANIEL G. WOOD, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763680 - 2024-02-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶38. This test requires balancing the personal characteristics of the defendant against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938405 - 2025-04-08

COURT OF APPEALS
conducting a series of field sobriety tests, most of which Ballweg failed, the officer arrested Ballweg. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32519 - 2008-04-23

[PDF] NOTICE
test, constitute probable cause to arrest someone for driving while under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34197 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
had been tested by two veterinary clinics and was found to be nonviable. ¶4 Hunter denied having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102089 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
eyes were bloodshot and glassy. After conducting a series of field sobriety tests, most of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32519 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
there. Sergeant Becker administered field sobriety tests and subsequently arrested Will. ¶7 The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53254 - 2014-09-15

Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
. We conclude that the ordinance is ambiguous. The test of ambiguity is whether the ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14174 - 2005-03-31