Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36351 - 36360 of 63985 for records/1000.
Search results 36351 - 36360 of 63985 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.2d 363. ¶5 Green argues that “[t]he record does not show an admission of conduct by the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162186 - 2017-09-21
.2d 363. ¶5 Green argues that “[t]he record does not show an admission of conduct by the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162186 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that was within Hughes’ control at the time of the seizure. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063758 - 2026-01-21
that was within Hughes’ control at the time of the seizure. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063758 - 2026-01-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth R. Parrish
. The record reflects that between August 12, 2003, and February 10, 2005, Parrish filed four to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20778 - 2017-09-21
. The record reflects that between August 12, 2003, and February 10, 2005, Parrish filed four to six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the direct consequences of his pleas. The record does not support Stone’s argument. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36216 - 2014-09-15
of the direct consequences of his pleas. The record does not support Stone’s argument. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36216 - 2014-09-15
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
credibility. ¶6 The record supports the trial court’s findings that Polich’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
credibility. ¶6 The record supports the trial court’s findings that Polich’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
without an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97632 - 2013-06-04
without an evidentiary hearing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97632 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Hyland
The record contains a copy of a document entitled “Stipulation & Order,” which apparently refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5237 - 2017-09-19
The record contains a copy of a document entitled “Stipulation & Order,” which apparently refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5237 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
but that Jones was non-compliant. The circuit court also considered Jones’s prior record, his resistance when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29255 - 2007-06-04
but that Jones was non-compliant. The circuit court also considered Jones’s prior record, his resistance when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29255 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was significantly compromised by the remote appearance. However, the record and Schultz’s own admissions in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850856 - 2024-09-18
was significantly compromised by the remote appearance. However, the record and Schultz’s own admissions in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850856 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State put on the record is what the State said.” The circuit court continued: The Court was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283233 - 2020-09-01
the State put on the record is what the State said.” The circuit court continued: The Court was the one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283233 - 2020-09-01