Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36381 - 36390 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 36381 - 36390 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Officer Savagian testified that he and two other officers—Hunter and Sonya Griffin—were on duty together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170947 - 2017-09-21
Officer Savagian testified that he and two other officers—Hunter and Sonya Griffin—were on duty together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 42
have all the duties generally held by a supervising attorney under SCR 20:5.1(b). 4. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65891 - 2014-09-15
have all the duties generally held by a supervising attorney under SCR 20:5.1(b). 4. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the interests of justice and appropriate recognition of the duties of the prosecution in relation to promises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97931 - 2014-09-15
that the interests of justice and appropriate recognition of the duties of the prosecution in relation to promises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Precision Erecting, Inc. v. AFW Foundry, Inc.
reason to dispute the facts supporting the motion, it is that litigant’s duty to appear and object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13823 - 2014-09-15
reason to dispute the facts supporting the motion, it is that litigant’s duty to appear and object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13823 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Entity’s duty to report to the department. Except as provided under pars. (b) and (c), an entity shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
the Entity’s duty to report to the department. Except as provided under pars. (b) and (c), an entity shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=984590 - 2025-07-17
[PDF]
State v. John L. Jones
, 355, 348 N.W.2d 183 (Ct. App. 1984) (appellate court has duty to affirm sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6534 - 2017-09-19
, 355, 348 N.W.2d 183 (Ct. App. 1984) (appellate court has duty to affirm sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6534 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 74
, 517 N.W.2d 538 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶4 It is the duty of this court, notwithstanding the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173358 - 2017-09-21
, 517 N.W.2d 538 (Ct. App. 1994). ¶4 It is the duty of this court, notwithstanding the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173358 - 2017-09-21
Shirley Sherrer v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
[class]room performing her duties on September 28, 1994 when a student dropped a fluorescent light bulb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12644 - 2005-03-31
[class]room performing her duties on September 28, 1994 when a student dropped a fluorescent light bulb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12644 - 2005-03-31
Gaylene Schwalen v. James E. Howey
at the modification hearing or that it was made part of the record on appeal. “[I]t is not the duty of this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2669 - 2005-03-31
at the modification hearing or that it was made part of the record on appeal. “[I]t is not the duty of this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2669 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
F.M. Management Company Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
for an exemption. The statute uses the word “shall,” and, generally, “shall” creates a mandatory duty. Hubbard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6574 - 2017-09-19
for an exemption. The statute uses the word “shall,” and, generally, “shall” creates a mandatory duty. Hubbard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6574 - 2017-09-19