Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36381 - 36390 of 63601 for records.
Search results 36381 - 36390 of 63601 for records.
State v. Christopher Townsend
whether she had “any challenge to the conviction that I’ve just read into the record that forms the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2169 - 2005-03-31
whether she had “any challenge to the conviction that I’ve just read into the record that forms the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2169 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
discrimination. Based upon the facts in the record, we conclude that the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2842 - 2005-03-31
discrimination. Based upon the facts in the record, we conclude that the trial court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2842 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332989 - 2021-02-09
an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=332989 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078122 - 2026-02-17
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078122 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
State v. John G. Anderson
request to testify at trial is premised on a factual assertion that is not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
request to testify at trial is premised on a factual assertion that is not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Walters Family Trust v. Scott Walters
that day, each reviewed the available records and statements, including notes made by the attending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6704 - 2017-09-20
that day, each reviewed the available records and statements, including notes made by the attending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6704 - 2017-09-20
County of Sauk v. Jammie M. Douglas
an opportunity to have a second test performed. There is, however, no suggestion in the record that the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6274 - 2005-03-31
an opportunity to have a second test performed. There is, however, no suggestion in the record that the first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
is clearly erroneous.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
is clearly erroneous.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003658 - 2025-09-03
State v. Chad A. Dunbarger
to the facts of record and, thus, presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7615 - 2005-03-31
to the facts of record and, thus, presents a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7615 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steve Hause v. Robert Sauer
Cheryl asks that Robert be taken off of the caption. However, there is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13436 - 2017-09-21
Cheryl asks that Robert be taken off of the caption. However, there is nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13436 - 2017-09-21