Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36381 - 36390 of 63519 for records/1000.
Search results 36381 - 36390 of 63519 for records/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
mandatory duty to order restitution or to give its reasons on the record for not doing so.” Borst, 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30637 - 2014-09-15
mandatory duty to order restitution or to give its reasons on the record for not doing so.” Borst, 181
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30637 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Buren F. Sprague
it refused to accept his offer to stipulate to his prior drunk driving record. He relies upon Old Chief v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13277 - 2017-09-21
it refused to accept his offer to stipulate to his prior drunk driving record. He relies upon Old Chief v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13277 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. George G. Kidd
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). In reviewing the record before us, we conclude that Kidd cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9997 - 2017-09-19
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). In reviewing the record before us, we conclude that Kidd cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9997 - 2017-09-19
State v. Tong T.
for having two other counts dismissed and read into the record. The charge arose out of allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5687 - 2005-03-31
for having two other counts dismissed and read into the record. The charge arose out of allegations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5687 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
were void because they (1) violated Wisconsin’s open meetings and public records laws, (2) violated UW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31966 - 2008-02-27
were void because they (1) violated Wisconsin’s open meetings and public records laws, (2) violated UW
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31966 - 2008-02-27
Harry Bruce Pomeroy v. Jennifer Ann Pomeroy
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23
decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26289 - 2006-08-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039687 - 2025-11-18
COURT OF APPEALS
and the assistant district attorney discussed a plea agreement. Although the record is not entirely clear regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83327 - 2012-06-04
and the assistant district attorney discussed a plea agreement. Although the record is not entirely clear regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83327 - 2012-06-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the direct consequences of his pleas. The record does not support Stone’s argument. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36216 - 2014-09-15
of the direct consequences of his pleas. The record does not support Stone’s argument. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36216 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=953889 - 2025-05-14