Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3641 - 3650 of 63706 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3641 - 3650 of 63706 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
22, 2018, while Jones was out of custody on bond in case No. 2018CF3700, officers executed a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
22, 2018, while Jones was out of custody on bond in case No. 2018CF3700, officers executed a search
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
22, 2018, while Jones was out of custody on bond in case No. 2018CF3700, officers executed a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
22, 2018, while Jones was out of custody on bond in case No. 2018CF3700, officers executed a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704322 - 2023-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 182
court’s reasoning in denying the motion that the State did not have “exclusive possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34477 - 2014-09-15
court’s reasoning in denying the motion that the State did not have “exclusive possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34477 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI App 182
court’s reasoning in denying the motion that the State did not have “exclusive possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34477 - 2008-12-16
court’s reasoning in denying the motion that the State did not have “exclusive possession, custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34477 - 2008-12-16
State v. Carl R. Kramer
. § 945.03(5) (1995-96),[1] and from orders denying his motions for suppression and dismissal of the felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
. § 945.03(5) (1995-96),[1] and from orders denying his motions for suppression and dismissal of the felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16054 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carl R. Kramer
. STAT. § 945.03(5) (1995-96),1 and from orders denying his motions for suppression and dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16054 - 2017-09-21
. STAT. § 945.03(5) (1995-96),1 and from orders denying his motions for suppression and dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16054 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FORM SUMMARY
: Objection to Relocate with Minor Children and Motion to Change Placement/Custody Form Number: FA
/formdisplay/FA-4179Vs_summary.pdf?formNumber=FA-4179Vs&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-02-06
: Objection to Relocate with Minor Children and Motion to Change Placement/Custody Form Number: FA
/formdisplay/FA-4179Vs_summary.pdf?formNumber=FA-4179Vs&formType=Summary&formatId=2&language=en - 2020-02-06
State v. Oto Orlik
, denying Orlik’s motion. The court interpreted §§ 969.01 and 969.03, Stats., to allow a court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
, denying Orlik’s motion. The court interpreted §§ 969.01 and 969.03, Stats., to allow a court to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Oto Orlik
to post the cash bond—the designation of the motion as one to modify the conditions of release under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14570 - 2017-09-21
to post the cash bond—the designation of the motion as one to modify the conditions of release under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14570 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the examining psychologist’s opinion, the court found Powell competent to proceed. Powell’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196777 - 2017-09-26
with the examining psychologist’s opinion, the court found Powell competent to proceed. Powell’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196777 - 2017-09-26