Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3641 - 3650 of 83958 for simple case search.
Search results 3641 - 3650 of 83958 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a distinction that the case law appears to recognize between assignment documents, which can take the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691777 - 2023-08-17
for a distinction that the case law appears to recognize between assignment documents, which can take the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691777 - 2023-08-17
[PDF]
State v. Travis J. Smith
to suppress evidence that was discovered during an allegedly illegal search; and (2) denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
to suppress evidence that was discovered during an allegedly illegal search; and (2) denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
State v. Travis J. Smith
an allegedly illegal search; and (2) denied his motion for a new trial without holding an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31
an allegedly illegal search; and (2) denied his motion for a new trial without holding an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6189 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on appeal treat this case as a stop-and-frisk case, and therefore, subject to the limitations to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185479 - 2017-09-21
on appeal treat this case as a stop-and-frisk case, and therefore, subject to the limitations to search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185479 - 2017-09-21
State v. Cain Wiskow
suppression motion because a warrantless search of his room violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3949 - 2005-03-31
suppression motion because a warrantless search of his room violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3949 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. He argues he was entitled to a Franks/Mann hearing regarding his claim that a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85590 - 2014-09-15
. He argues he was entitled to a Franks/Mann hearing regarding his claim that a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85590 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of his right to refuse a request that he consent to a search. The court denied that motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27417 - 2014-09-15
of his right to refuse a request that he consent to a search. The court denied that motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27417 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was entitled to a Franks/Mann hearing regarding his claim that a search warrant omitted information that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85590 - 2012-07-30
was entitled to a Franks/Mann hearing regarding his claim that a search warrant omitted information that would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85590 - 2012-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
consent to a search. The court denied that motion without a hearing on the ground that Golden waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27417 - 2006-12-13
consent to a search. The court denied that motion without a hearing on the ground that Golden waived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27417 - 2006-12-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deemed an unlawful search and suppressed as evidence. The court later signed a subpoena from the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305386 - 2020-11-17
deemed an unlawful search and suppressed as evidence. The court later signed a subpoena from the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305386 - 2020-11-17