Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3641 - 3650 of 5705 for writ.
Search results 3641 - 3650 of 5705 for writ.
[PDF]
WI App 71
the “‘extraordinary writ of habeas corpus,’ which itself is ‘available to a petitioner only under limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039828 - 2026-01-26
the “‘extraordinary writ of habeas corpus,’ which itself is ‘available to a petitioner only under limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039828 - 2026-01-26
[PDF]
WI 52
., filed an Emergency Application for Stay Pending Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044018 - 2025-11-26
., filed an Emergency Application for Stay Pending Petition for Writ of Certiorari with the United States
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044018 - 2025-11-26
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
, CERQ = Certified Question, BYPA = Petition to bypass, ORIG = Original Action, WRIT = Petition
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=852097 - 2024-09-17
, CERQ = Certified Question, BYPA = Petition to bypass, ORIG = Original Action, WRIT = Petition
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=852097 - 2024-09-17
[PDF]
City of Oshkosh v. Christopher Mack
not seek a writ of prohibition from this court. The rule in Wisconsin is simply stated: “once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11148 - 2017-09-19
not seek a writ of prohibition from this court. The rule in Wisconsin is simply stated: “once
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11148 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
days in Case No. 2013CF709. Ware subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
days in Case No. 2013CF709. Ware subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
2009 WI App 35
court signed a judgment of eviction and a writ of restitution. However, after receiving an “undertaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35499 - 2009-03-24
court signed a judgment of eviction and a writ of restitution. However, after receiving an “undertaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35499 - 2009-03-24
COURT OF APPEALS
(N.D. Ind. 1996), a federal case, does not save him. First, Clay was an appeal of a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
(N.D. Ind. 1996), a federal case, does not save him. First, Clay was an appeal of a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
days in Case No. 2013CF709. Ware subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
days in Case No. 2013CF709. Ware subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
Marcia A. Klein v. Wisconsin Resource Center
In such a case, the requester may seek review of that decision through a writ of mandamus. See § 19.35(4)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12177 - 2017-09-21
In such a case, the requester may seek review of that decision through a writ of mandamus. See § 19.35(4)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12177 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), a federal case, does not save him. First, Clay was an appeal of a writ of habeas corpus, not a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
), a federal case, does not save him. First, Clay was an appeal of a writ of habeas corpus, not a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15