Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36411 - 36420 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
follow a two-part test for ineffective assistance of counsel claims. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49029 - 2010-04-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The test is not whether the lawyer should expect the argument to prevail. See SCR 20:3.1, cmt. (action
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234236 - 2019-02-04

State v. Joseph Keepers
of counsel at the suppression hearing. II. Analysis. ¶9 The familiar two-pronged test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2284 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
caretaker activity. ¶13 Conducting the balancing test, we see a public good in returning a lost purse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59276 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
an offense. “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50966 - 2010-06-15

[PDF] State v. Anthony L.K.
)], the Court applied this balancing test to determine the legality of an on-the-street frisk of a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11443 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
There is no set test for determining whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion; rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31914 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
test which should have raised a red flag requiring him to make sure she understood the policies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34073 - 2014-09-15

State v. Gary A. Michels
the framework of the two-part test set forth in Usery: (1) First, a court must consider whether the legislature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4672 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
facto clause. Garner, 529 U.S. at 250. The test is whether retroactive application of a new parole law
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103111 - 2013-10-14