Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36421 - 36430 of 83946 for case search.
Search results 36421 - 36430 of 83946 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Arthur C. List
2004 WI App 230 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-3149-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7072 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 230 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-3149-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7072 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M.P.
in this case. These changes do not affect our analysis. No. 97-0872 3 that “a court’s loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12270 - 2014-09-15
in this case. These changes do not affect our analysis. No. 97-0872 3 that “a court’s loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12270 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rodney Calhoun
battery and disorderly conduct in the first case and misdemeanor bailjumping in the second case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9761 - 2017-09-19
battery and disorderly conduct in the first case and misdemeanor bailjumping in the second case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9761 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Douglas A. v. Winnebago County
. The family contends that because of the “equities” of the case the alleged other acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
. The family contends that because of the “equities” of the case the alleged other acts or omissions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Richard G. Bedessem v. Donna J. Bedessem
. At issue in this case is the trial court’s division of 139 shares of Farmers State Bank stock. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11360 - 2017-09-19
. At issue in this case is the trial court’s division of 139 shares of Farmers State Bank stock. First
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11360 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion for summary judgment and summary judgment motions are not permitted in traffic forfeiture cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76321 - 2014-09-15
a motion for summary judgment and summary judgment motions are not permitted in traffic forfeiture cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76321 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
prosecutor. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
prosecutor. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=960409 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a misdemeanor case: Kenosha County case No. 12-CM-378. One of the conditions of bond was that he not commit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149286 - 2017-09-21
in a misdemeanor case: Kenosha County case No. 12-CM-378. One of the conditions of bond was that he not commit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149286 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶2 As relevant, in this divorce case, the circuit court entered two orders prohibiting Nathan from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658241 - 2023-05-24
¶2 As relevant, in this divorce case, the circuit court entered two orders prohibiting Nathan from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=658241 - 2023-05-24
State v. George Schertz
2002 WI App 289 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0789 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5073 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 289 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0789 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5073 - 2005-03-31