Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36421 - 36430 of 40068 for financial disclosure statement.

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Cynthia M.
points to the statement in M.D.S. that “where the legislature provides the right to be ‘represented
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13976 - 2005-03-31

Rosemary K. Oliveira v. City of Milwaukee
waived the issue of the lack of notice. The Milwaukee city attorney's statements before the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17427 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
numerous victim impact statements filed in the case. According to those statements, Cross had molested
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51859 - 2010-07-07

[PDF] State v. Shoua Vang
to police, charges were not filed because a detective found “problems” with some of her statements based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6906 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statement. The court awarded Blakley $1,000 in damages on that claim—double the amount of his $500
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650754 - 2023-05-02

[PDF] State v. Mario Santiago Sanchez
distinct from the federal Constitution's right. The defendant cannot point to any clear statement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16897 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Virginia Baumgarten v. City View Nursing Home
or in unnecessary detail, but it should state an evidentiary hypothesis underpinned by a sufficient statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21788 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
-person jury and only by a personal and affirmative statement in open court. Because the defendants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17520 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Cynthia M.
, Cynthia points to the statement in M.D.S. that “where the legislature provides the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13975 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
hearing despite the circuit court’s confusion and incorrect statement to the contrary on August 20, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109215 - 2014-03-13