Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36431 - 36440 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 36431 - 36440 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.
2006 WI APP 235
to the charge following the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Patton’s motion contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26898 - 2006-11-20
to the charge following the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Patton’s motion contended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26898 - 2006-11-20
CA Blank Order
had served the entirety of his thirty-five-year sentence. Richards filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129268 - 2014-11-13
had served the entirety of his thirty-five-year sentence. Richards filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129268 - 2014-11-13
2009 WI APP 99
(1m)(h)2. (2007-08).[1] Earl contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36881 - 2009-07-28
(1m)(h)2. (2007-08).[1] Earl contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36881 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion asking the court to clarify how it determined the equalization payment and to reduce by twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150940 - 2017-09-21
a motion asking the court to clarify how it determined the equalization payment and to reduce by twenty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=150940 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
This criminal case examines post-conviction motions and procedures under Wis. Stat. � 974.06 in light of case
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=115&year=2009
This criminal case examines post-conviction motions and procedures under Wis. Stat. � 974.06 in light of case
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=115&year=2009
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
a motion to suppress all of the evidence obtained after the stop. The circuit court denied the motion
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=105&year=2008
a motion to suppress all of the evidence obtained after the stop. The circuit court denied the motion
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=105&year=2008
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
children, Derrick, Daniel, and Gemma, and denying his postdispositional motion to dismiss the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
children, Derrick, Daniel, and Gemma, and denying his postdispositional motion to dismiss the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936989 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), and 939.05 (2011-12). 1 Mack also appeals from an order partially denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162861 - 2017-09-21
), and 939.05 (2011-12). 1 Mack also appeals from an order partially denying his postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162861 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
% to Verkler. The jury awarded damages to Verkler. ¶14 Verkler filed a motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252470 - 2020-01-22
% to Verkler. The jury awarded damages to Verkler. ¶14 Verkler filed a motion for judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252470 - 2020-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 174.02(1)(b).[1] The trial court also denied Schroeder’s motion for additur following a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28
. Stat. § 174.02(1)(b).[1] The trial court also denied Schroeder’s motion for additur following a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118461 - 2014-07-28