Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36431 - 36440 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 36431 - 36440 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
COURT OF APPEALS
. CHRISTENSON, Judge. Affirmed; motion for frivolous appeal costs denied. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31873 - 2008-02-19
. CHRISTENSON, Judge. Affirmed; motion for frivolous appeal costs denied. Before Curley, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31873 - 2008-02-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that denied his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08).[1] He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49241 - 2010-04-26
that denied his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2007-08).[1] He asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49241 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
. CHRISTENSON, Judge. Affirmed; motion for frivolous appeal costs denied. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31873 - 2014-09-15
. CHRISTENSON, Judge. Affirmed; motion for frivolous appeal costs denied. Before Curley, P.J., Wedemeyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31873 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daymon D. Tate
., Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daymon D. Tate appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6148 - 2017-09-19
., Schudson and Curley, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Daymon D. Tate appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6148 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint was filed, the State filed a motion to invoke the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15
complaint was filed, the State filed a motion to invoke the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96201 - 2014-09-15
State v. William L. Morford
the order granting the State’s motion for reconsideration and committing him as a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
the order granting the State’s motion for reconsideration and committing him as a sexually violent person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Jonathan L. Rausch appeals pro se from a circuit court order that denied his postconviction motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49241 - 2014-09-15
. Jonathan L. Rausch appeals pro se from a circuit court order that denied his postconviction motion filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49241 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion alleging that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel and was therefore entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605810 - 2023-01-04
motion alleging that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel and was therefore entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605810 - 2023-01-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
).1 He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Solis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251830 - 2019-12-26
).1 He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Solis’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251830 - 2019-12-26
[PDF]
State v. James L. Holloway
and 939.05, STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a Nos. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8316 - 2017-09-19
and 939.05, STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a Nos. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8316 - 2017-09-19