Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36441 - 36450 of 64616 for b's.
Search results 36441 - 36450 of 64616 for b's.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the United States or any supplement to either of them; (b) Any substance intended for use in the diagnosis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131025 - 2014-12-01
of the United States or any supplement to either of them; (b) Any substance intended for use in the diagnosis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131025 - 2014-12-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
performance or prejudice stemming from his trial attorney’s handling of the missing witness statement. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997588 - 2025-08-20
performance or prejudice stemming from his trial attorney’s handling of the missing witness statement. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997588 - 2025-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
or her remaining initial confinement time to extended supervision time. See Wis. Stat. §§ 302.045(3m)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90711 - 2012-12-17
or her remaining initial confinement time to extended supervision time. See Wis. Stat. §§ 302.045(3m)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90711 - 2012-12-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective. No. 2021AP867-CR 10 “[b]ecause the decision to plead guilty is a personal right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586118 - 2022-11-03
ineffective. No. 2021AP867-CR 10 “[b]ecause the decision to plead guilty is a personal right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586118 - 2022-11-03
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. Goad
. § 552(b); 28 C.F.R. §§ 16.22, 16.24 and 16.26. Knowing that he had not subpoenaed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13049 - 2017-09-21
. § 552(b); 28 C.F.R. §§ 16.22, 16.24 and 16.26. Knowing that he had not subpoenaed her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13049 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 84
adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84685 - 2014-09-15
adversely on his honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer, in violation of SCR 20:8.4(b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84685 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for second-degree recklessly endangering safety. 3 B. Challenges Relating To Verdict Forms ¶16 As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212555 - 2018-05-10
for second-degree recklessly endangering safety. 3 B. Challenges Relating To Verdict Forms ¶16 As we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212555 - 2018-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
States v. Olano, 62 F.3d 1180, 1190 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding that “[b]ecause a jury’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211718 - 2018-05-01
States v. Olano, 62 F.3d 1180, 1190 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding that “[b]ecause a jury’s brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211718 - 2018-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Travis J. Smith
into and limited search of Smith’s hotel room was a valid search incident to arrest.3 B. Evidentiary Hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
into and limited search of Smith’s hotel room was a valid search incident to arrest.3 B. Evidentiary Hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
expenses $_________ (B) Future health care expenses $_________ (C) Past pain, suffering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81389 - 2014-09-15
expenses $_________ (B) Future health care expenses $_________ (C) Past pain, suffering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81389 - 2014-09-15