Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36451 - 36460 of 73966 for public records.

State v. Saturnino R. Guerra-Reyna
, assistant state public defender. Respondent ATTORNEYSFor the plaintiff-respondent the cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7748 - 2005-03-31

Kevin J. Kollock v. City of Cumberland Zoning Board of Appeals
clear, the power of the zoning authority to control land use for the purpose of promoting public health
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7446 - 2005-03-31

State v. Garrett A.B.
was “a danger to the public and in need of the most restrictive custodial treatment,” the trial court directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14068 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yasmin H.
participating and that her lack of participation is contrary to public policy. We disagree. ¶8 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19457 - 2017-09-21

State v. Isaac J.R.
on the briefs of Susan E. Alesia, Assistant State Public Defender. Respondent ATTORNEYS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12571 - 2005-03-31

State v. John F. Draves
., and a judgment of conviction of threatening to injure a public officer contrary to § 943.30(1) and (4), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10858 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Furthermore, the officers acted reasonably to protect their own safety and the safety of the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98081 - 2014-09-15

State v. Charles W. Mark
, assistant state public defender. For the petitioner-respondent the cause was argued by Warren D. Weinstein
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25744 - 2006-06-28

[PDF] State v. Charles W. Mark
argument by Glenn L. Cushing, assistant state public defender. For the petitioner-respondent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25744 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] AP001058 State v. Winston B. Eison
, JJ., Publication Committee. The court having filed its opinion in each of the above-entitled appeals
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265754 - 2020-06-23