Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36461 - 36470 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 36461 - 36470 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Joseph J.J.
). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10814 - 2005-03-31
). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10814 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this unjust enrichment action. Concluding that this essentially was a case of “rob[bing] Peter to pay Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
this unjust enrichment action. Concluding that this essentially was a case of “rob[bing] Peter to pay Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86527 - 2012-08-28
Winnebago County v. Travis G. Lankford
in this case had failed to correctly calibrate on other occasions involving other suspects. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7557 - 2005-03-31
in this case had failed to correctly calibrate on other occasions involving other suspects. We uphold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7557 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William C. Rosenberg
occurred in 1989 and 1996. Both cases involved civil forfeitures and were adjudicated in municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2764 - 2017-09-19
occurred in 1989 and 1996. Both cases involved civil forfeitures and were adjudicated in municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2764 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael Montey v. Steve's on Bluemound
no duty to protect Montey. The trial court agreed, explaining: [T]he Delvaux case controls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15663 - 2017-09-21
no duty to protect Montey. The trial court agreed, explaining: [T]he Delvaux case controls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15663 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randolph S. Bauernfeind
the circumstances of the case and counsel's conduct and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances of the case and counsel's conduct and strategy unless the findings are clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11554 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
affirm the judgment. On June 24, 2004, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2003PA6050, Jimenez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
affirm the judgment. On June 24, 2004, in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2003PA6050, Jimenez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118128 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for habeas corpus in the present case on July 22, 2014, along with a supporting memorandum. 1 Faulkner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136846 - 2017-09-21
for habeas corpus in the present case on July 22, 2014, along with a supporting memorandum. 1 Faulkner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136846 - 2017-09-21
Barbara J. King v. "Jiffy Lube" Wisconsin
for evidentiary facts to determine whether Jiffy Lube has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11197 - 2005-03-31
for evidentiary facts to determine whether Jiffy Lube has made a prima facie case for summary judgment. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11197 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-month commitment order being appealed in this case has already expired. However, counsel argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731617 - 2023-11-22
-month commitment order being appealed in this case has already expired. However, counsel argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731617 - 2023-11-22