Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36461 - 36470 of 83455 for simple case search.
Search results 36461 - 36470 of 83455 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case is as follows. Ardell was cited for speeding on March 29, 2012, with an appearance date of April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
of this case is as follows. Ardell was cited for speeding on March 29, 2012, with an appearance date of April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93994 - 2013-03-12
COURT OF APPEALS
Company (“Amica”) in this personal injury case. Schaefer argues on appeal that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125851 - 2014-11-05
Company (“Amica”) in this personal injury case. Schaefer argues on appeal that the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125851 - 2014-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185412 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185412 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy R. Pamonicutt
are affirmed. No. 96-0698-CR -2- The procedure in this case is undisputed. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10513 - 2017-09-20
are affirmed. No. 96-0698-CR -2- The procedure in this case is undisputed. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10513 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
had served on him because that judge was not a party to the case. The court did not err in entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25967 - 2017-09-21
had served on him because that judge was not a party to the case. The court did not err in entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25967 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is unconstitutional. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20
is unconstitutional. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442352 - 2021-10-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179843 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179843 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jesse R.J.
Wilcox, the case social worker. Wilcox informed the court of the ongoing confusion regarding Jesse’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
Wilcox, the case social worker. Wilcox informed the court of the ongoing confusion regarding Jesse’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12283 - 2005-03-31
Judy Patricia Bushmaker v. Green Bay Diocese of The Roman Catholic Church
wrongly, during a civil lawsuit, referred to Witczak’s no contest pleas in the criminal case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11508 - 2005-03-31
wrongly, during a civil lawsuit, referred to Witczak’s no contest pleas in the criminal case; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11508 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2015AP1121-CR 2 summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194569 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for No. 2015AP1121-CR 2 summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194569 - 2017-09-21