Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 36461 - 36470 of 58500 for speedy trial.

09AP1977 State v. Tushar Achha
assistance of trial counsel. He did not present this issue to the trial court before filing this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59324 - 2011-01-25

[PDF] Claudia R. Cody v. Dane County
County. 1 She argues that the trial court erred in dismissing her claim because “a reasonable trier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2321 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand for a new trial on Kekula’s informed consent claim. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125621 - 2017-09-21

Lee Roberts v. Norman Jennings
. In April 1994, Jennings appealed this order to the trial court pursuant to § 80.17, Stats. On June 3, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9482 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 24
-party beneficiaries. A trial was held and a jury awarded damages to the Beckers, finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35207 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 184
awards arose “because of” the plaintiffs’ property damage. We affirm the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26256 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
Richardson Whether a defendant was deprived of his direct appeal due to the ineffectiveness of his trial
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246672 - 2019-09-11

[PDF] Sallie T. v. Milwaukee County Department of Health and Human Services
in a custody dispute; because the trial court properly exercised its discretion when it found that a change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11643 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the complaint stated a claim for unjust enrichment, and that claim proceeded to a bench trial. ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654945 - 2023-05-11

2006 WI APP 184
arose “because of” the plaintiffs’ property damage. We affirm the trial court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26256 - 2006-09-26